GrindBenchThe daily grind, benchmarked.
← Rankings

Kimi K3.1 Pro

How Kimi K3.1 Pro did on real work, graded automatically. A grade is the share of its work that was right: no deal-breaker mistakes and at least 80% of the checklist.

A 8 or more in 10 deliverables acceptableB 6 to 8 in 10 acceptableC 4 to 6 in 10 acceptableD 2 to 4 in 10 acceptableF fewer than 2 in 10 acceptable
Report cardGrindBench-PubSec

Overall grade: B

67% of its work was right, with nothing to fix.

Moonshot AIChinaOpen weights
Kind of workGradeAcceptable
ATIP redactionD20%
Procurement evaluationA90%
Performance analysisB66%
Bilingual equivalenceA90%
Ranking6th of 28In the top group: models in a group are too close to call apart.
Cost per task6.9¢$0.10 per acceptable result · about 2.4 min per task

Other measures

Weighted rubric score
94% · 1st best of 28
Grounding errors
9.6 per 1k words · 11th best of 28 (lower is better)
Ambiguity flagged
75% · 9th best of 28

Comment Strongest at procurement evaluation (90%). Needs work on ATIP redaction (20%). In the top group overall.

How it's marked

Every answer is checked by code and by an independent grader from a lab none of the tested models come from, against a checklist of what a manager would catch. One deal-breaker, like a wrong figure or a missed redaction, and the draft fails.

How we test, in full → · What would it cost for your work?

Next

See the work itself

Real tasks, what each model wrote, and exactly what the grader caught.