GrindBenchThe daily grind, benchmarked.
← Rankings

DeepSeek V4 Pro

How DeepSeek V4 Pro did on real work, graded automatically. A grade is the share of its work that was right: no deal-breaker mistakes and at least 80% of the checklist.

A 8 or more in 10 deliverables acceptableB 6 to 8 in 10 acceptableC 4 to 6 in 10 acceptableD 2 to 4 in 10 acceptableF fewer than 2 in 10 acceptable
Report cardGrindBench-PubSec

Overall grade: D

40% of its work was right, with nothing to fix.

DeepSeekChinaOpen weights
Kind of workGradeAcceptable
ATIP redactionF9%
Procurement evaluationC51%
Performance analysisD28%
Bilingual equivalenceA81%
Ranking19th of 28In group 5 of 9: models in a group are too close to call apart.
Cost per task1.4¢3.5¢ per acceptable result · about 27 s per task

Other measures

Weighted rubric score
83% · 20th best of 28
Grounding errors
12.1 per 1k words · 19th best of 28 (lower is better)
Ambiguity flagged
46% · 19th best of 28

Comment Strongest at bilingual equivalence (81%). Needs work on ATIP redaction (9%). In group 5 of 9 overall.

How it's marked

Every answer is checked by code and by an independent grader from a lab none of the tested models come from, against a checklist of what a manager would catch. One deal-breaker, like a wrong figure or a missed redaction, and the draft fails.

How we test, in full → · What would it cost for your work?

Next

See the work itself

Real tasks, what each model wrote, and exactly what the grader caught.