GrindBenchThe daily grind, benchmarked.
← Rankings

Claude Opus 5.5

How Claude Opus 5.5 did on real work, graded automatically. A grade is the share of its work that was right: no deal-breaker mistakes and at least 80% of the checklist.

A 8 or more in 10 deliverables acceptableB 6 to 8 in 10 acceptableC 4 to 6 in 10 acceptableD 2 to 4 in 10 acceptableF fewer than 2 in 10 acceptable
Report cardGrindBench-PubSec

Overall grade: B

68% of its work was right, with nothing to fix.

AnthropicUnited StatesClosed weights
Kind of workGradeAcceptable
ATIP redactionD33%
Procurement evaluationA97%
Performance analysisB64%
Bilingual equivalenceB80%
Ranking4th of 28In the top group: models in a group are too close to call apart.
Cost per task6.7¢9.9¢ per acceptable result

Other measures

Weighted rubric score
90% · 15th best of 28
Grounding errors
14.7 per 1k words · 24th best of 28 (lower is better)
Ambiguity flagged
88% · 1st best of 28

Comment Strongest at procurement evaluation (97%). Needs work on ATIP redaction (33%). In the top group overall.

How it's marked

Every answer is checked by code and by an independent grader from a lab none of the tested models come from, against a checklist of what a manager would catch. One deal-breaker, like a wrong figure or a missed redaction, and the draft fails.

How we test, in full → · What would it cost for your work?

Next

See the work itself

Real tasks, what each model wrote, and exactly what the grader caught.