Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Too close to call. On the work we tested, Muse Spark 1.3 and GPT-6.1 Sol can't be told apart. GPT-6.1 Sol is the cheaper one, slightly.
GrindBench-PubSec
BMuse Spark 1.3Meta64% 59–70%1.7¢ a task · 300 tasksCGPT-6.1 SolOpenAI58% 52–63%1.3¢ a task · 300 tasks
Too close to call here: their ranges overlap, so on another set of tasks the order could flip.
| Kind of work | Muse Spark 1.3 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| ATIP redaction | 25% | 0% |
| Procurement evaluation | 78% | 80% |
| Performance analysis | 61% | 60% |
| Bilingual equivalence | 93% | 85% |
GrindBench-Banking
BMuse Spark 1.3Meta63% 52–75%6.6¢ a task · 60 tasksBGPT-6.1 SolOpenAI63% 50–75%5.4¢ a task · 60 tasks
Too close to call here: their ranges overlap, so on another set of tasks the order could flip.
| Kind of work | Muse Spark 1.3 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Lending & mortgages | 60% | 60% |
| AML & KYC | 70% | 30% |
| Deposits & payments | 40% | 60% |
| Complaints & conduct | 80% | 100% |
| Credit risk | 70% | 60% |
| Capital & liquidity | 60% | 70% |
Each kind of work here rests on 10 tasks per model, so a single row can easily be 20 points off. A lead of 10 points or more is in bold; read it as a hint, not a result.