Gemma 4 31B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B
Too close to call. On the work we tested, Gemma 4 31B and Gemma 4 26B A4B can't be told apart. Gemma 4 26B A4B is the cheaper one, slightly.
GrindBench-PubSec
DGemma 4 31BGoogle21% 16–26%0.036¢ a task · 300 tasksFGemma 4 26B A4BGoogle17% 13–21%0.027¢ a task · 300 tasks
Too close to call here: their ranges overlap, so on another set of tasks the order could flip.
| Kind of work | Gemma 4 31B | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
|---|---|---|
| ATIP redaction | 0% | 0% |
| Procurement evaluation | 14% | 2% |
| Performance analysis | 1% | 0% |
| Bilingual equivalence | 90% | 85% |
GrindBench-Banking
FGemma 4 31BGoogle0% 0–0%0.19¢ a task · 60 tasksFGemma 4 26B A4BGoogle0% 0–0%0.14¢ a task · 60 tasks
Too close to call here: their ranges overlap, so on another set of tasks the order could flip.
| Kind of work | Gemma 4 31B | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
|---|---|---|
| Lending & mortgages | 0% | 0% |
| AML & KYC | 0% | 0% |
| Deposits & payments | 0% | 0% |
| Complaints & conduct | 0% | 0% |
| Credit risk | 0% | 0% |
| Capital & liquidity | 0% | 0% |
Each kind of work here rests on 10 tasks per model, so a single row can easily be 20 points off. A lead of 10 points or more is in bold; read it as a hint, not a result.